PDA

View Full Version : Tippman vs everything else


mrmartin
10-31-2006, 10:07 AM
I am asking the opinion of everyone on why it seems that you eather love Tippmans or hate them. I have used several diffrent types of Tippmans (from crap rentals to A-5's and heavy modified others) and found they just don't work for me or my style of shooting. Not that they did not work, they performed just fine. It's the way it sits in my shooting profile that bugs. They also were to heavy for me to use effectively in a scouting posistion that requires a light marker for movement. So it can't be the old arguement of "TIPPMAN"S SUCK!!!" that I have seen posted without any base comparison. I am just interested in why this seemingly love/hate thing exist for this brand of marker (kinda like being a Dallas Cowboy fan.........:D j/k)

jtpaintball70
10-31-2006, 10:37 AM
The only Tippmann I like is my SL-68II that I've modified to modified stock class. 12g changer and 15 rd feed tube means it's lighter than usual

mrmartin
10-31-2006, 11:16 AM
The only Tippmann I like is my SL-68II that I've modified to modified stock class. 12g changer and 15 rd feed tube means it's lighter than usual

I wouldn't mind seeing that on the 25th. That sounds like a decent set-up.

jtpaintball70
10-31-2006, 12:16 PM
I'll make sure to toss it in my gear bag :)

wookie
10-31-2006, 05:23 PM
I enjoyed them for several years, but my style of play has changed.

I liek that you can really trick them out to look milsim, but after a long day, an 11 pound battle rifle gets pretty heavy. :)

cyn1c
11-01-2006, 07:04 AM
I learned to play with a Tippmann and probably rented one about 15 times before I got a spyder. I thought they were good solid guns that are hard to get to go down. My spyder was a lot easier to jam or freeze up.

In the end though, my prefence is for more compact setups, and Tippmann seems unwillng to steer their product line in that direction. I really dig the milsim look, I don't like a lot of useless crap strapped on the gun. If it is there it needs to do something! Also, the hopper completely ruins in IMO.

Like mrmartin said, their guns are heavier than they need to be.

cyn1c
11-03-2006, 12:43 PM
Have you guys heard of this new X-7?

http://tippmann.com/
http://tippmann.com/product_guide/markerdetails.aspx?categoryid=12

jtpaintball70
11-03-2006, 09:08 PM
yea, one of the guys on milsimog posted it. I'm not happy with it at all.

wookie
11-03-2006, 09:15 PM
Specops & Tippmann co-project....

mr. thunderclese
12-07-2006, 10:12 AM
i love my tippmann 98c with cyclone its super reliable. i have never been on the field and had anything go wrong with it(knock on wood). nothing frustrates me more than having my ass shot off cause my gun messed up......

BenBach
04-13-2007, 01:22 PM
tippmann's are the ak47 of paintball. drop them, bang them up, get dirt in them, and do whatever else you want with them...and in the end, when your spyder bolt is filled with dirt and water, and wont shoot. The tippmann will prevail.

They're heavy because they solid. 98 > A5 for sure. Tippmann > All others, with exception to to the auto mag. Thats my opinion and I've played on all kinds of guns. I play best with tippmann.

tinted rain
04-13-2007, 07:47 PM
i dunno....98 stock has accuracy to hell but they are really durable......

BenBach
04-13-2007, 08:18 PM
accuracy is dependent on the shooter, i assassinated plenty of people at the last war.

blargimevil
04-14-2007, 08:54 PM
not really, the crappy stock barrel on the 98 has more to do on the accuracy, unless the shooter doesnt know what he/she is doing (my friend thought he was supposed to aim down the hopper and shot another friend in the head).

BenBach
04-14-2007, 10:23 PM
exactly my point...accuracy depends on the shooter.

blargimevil
04-15-2007, 11:25 AM
well it does unless you know what you are doing then it depends on the barrel

kloki1971
04-16-2007, 12:17 PM
I'm a Mag guy, but I would rate the Tippmann a close second for durability. You can dig a trench with the 98 and still shoot straight. I recommended a Tipp for all new players because of their durability. I can't get away from a mag though for the compact and customizable design and the simplicity of the action. There is quite litterally two moving parts on a mag, the bolt and the trigger sear. On top of that you can use just about any mag part on any other mag, it makes for great second hand deals!

sketchy
04-30-2007, 04:10 PM
I feel tippmanns are a great gun for reliabity, easy to clean, easy to break down if you remeber about that little spring that pops out when split it two and are just a good all around gun that will pretty much fire no matter what. BUT, i was not comfortable with how the tank is set up into your shoulder. I felt it was a little long for me running a 20 co2 so i used a drop foward to accomidate my shorter arms. I had a 98 and it never let me down so i would recomend it especially if you upgraded the barrel and ran hpa on it, but like i said i HAD a 98. I sold it to persue more upgrades on my minimags.
MAGS RULE! HAHAHA i just thought i would throw that in there to keep things interesting.
:D

AngelDeville
05-17-2007, 08:48 PM
Tippmans are idiot proof, I recommend them to all newbies, much better than spyders.

wookie
05-17-2007, 08:51 PM
Welcome aboard AngelDeville.

WOLLFFY
05-17-2007, 09:04 PM
Second that, lets go north!

kloki1971
05-18-2007, 10:03 AM
Again, I have to say that I agree... Tippmans are ideal for new players, and they are better than spyders. They are a bit too milsim for me though...

xridgelinerx
12-08-2009, 12:14 PM
I'll probably get flamed for reviving an ancient thread, but have the members of the "its too heavy" gang seen or fired the new X-7 Phenom. Tippman is changing it's product line. Slowly, but this is a giant step in the right direction. Check one out.

skooby421
12-08-2009, 02:27 PM
i would have to agree that at the end of the day that tippmanns are heavy. i have a alpha black and i love it it has never let me down. i have tried other tippmanns and they have never let me down.i think they r good guns to have.

chongballa
12-08-2009, 07:11 PM
tippmanns are cool, but ill take my cocker based guns anyday

danath 34
12-10-2009, 11:05 AM
Here are my thoughts on Tippmanns.

They are decent guns for beginners. I will give them one thing. Reliability. I have seen 98s with paint and grease oozing out of every crack and they still shot. They will shoot and shoot all day long.

Here are the things I dont like about them:

1) Too heavy- Yes, I know, big deal, its a little heavy, lift weights, right? Well that still does not take away the fact that they are likely the heaviest guns out there. No matter how strong you are, you will still snap shoot better with a lighter gun. And yes the x7 phenom does seem to be alot lighter. I must say, I am impressed with the phenom. First tippmann product I actually like.

1.5) This is not really a whole-nother point, as it is basically the same as point number 1. They are way too big. If you are playing a game where gun hits do not count, congrats, you have a shield to use. But if you are playing where gun hits count, you are screwed. These guns are big, and that football on top is like a target...

2) They are gas HOGS! These things are like the SUV's of the paintball world. For areas like new mexico when 99% of paintball is played at outlaw fields, efficiency is a big deal. Not everyone has a scuba tank/co2 tank to bring to the field. You cant always just fill up whenever you want, alot of the time you can only shoot as much as the air you brought with you. And when you add on the other air accessories like the response trigger and the cyclone feed, it makes it worse.

3) They are money pits. They are way too costly for what they are. If they were a bit cheaper, I would definitely pick up at least a 98 to loan out to people. But 150+$ for a beginners gun? Please. Get an SP-1. And when you add in the price of all of the upgrades people put into these things to make them shoot faster/more efficiently/smoother, you could get a decent high end marker which will outperform any tippmann.

4) Cyclone feed = crap. You really oughta get the squishy paddles and aluminum ratchet to have a decent cyclone feed. Every time I play with someone running a cyclone feed, I see them wiping out broken paint at least once. And the plastic ratchet is definitely prone to breaking. I would much rather get a force fed hopper. It would be faster, more gentle on paint, and you would save on gas efficiency.

5) Way over-estimated performance. Claims of 30bps with an e-grip and stuff like that. I have seen ONE tippmann shoot what seemed like 30bps, and it was like spray paint, not paintballs.
Also there is the tippmann straight-line or whatever their rifled barrel is (i.e. not the flatline- that actually works). Rifled barrels for paintball are bullshit. Punkworks on TechPB has taken high speed video footage of "rifled" paintball barrels being used, and it is shown very clearly that no extra spin is put on the paintball over a regular, non rifled barrel.

6) too much proprietary stuff. You have to get tippmann threaded barrels, tippmann feednecks, you cant change the ASA's, etc. etc. I know spyder does this as well, but I think the problem is a little worse with Tippmann.

I personally would take a spyder over a tippmann any day. It is more efficient, smaller, lighter, and just as reliable. People say spyder aren't reliable, but I have owned plenty, and all you really have to replace if anything ever goes wrong is an oring. I cant tell you how many "broken" Spyders can be fixed by swapping out an o-ring. And its not like orings go bad often. With proper maintenance, they will last a long time. My spyder has yet to blow an oring. Problem is nobody actually takes apart their gun, cleans it all out, and puts fresh oring oil on the rings. Lack of maintenance doesn't make the gun un-reliable...


But when it all comes down to it, I will take my Timmy over both a spyder or a tippmann any day. It is faster, lighter, smaller, more efficient, has better technology, has more modes, and nearly-universal threading (autococker).

chongballa
12-10-2009, 04:59 PM
leave your timmi or spyder out in the rain for a week and see if it still shoots. ive personally seen this and the tippmann shot like it just came out of the box (caked in mud)

danath 34
12-11-2009, 02:46 PM
well I take care of my guns, because they will only perform as well as they are taken care of (including tippmanns) so why would you leave it out in the rain? But I guess if your plan is to leave your gun in the rain, then Tippmann by all means.

But I think a spyder would still shoot just like a tippmann would, as long as it is a mech spyder. If it has a board, of course not. But a mech should do fine. I have played with my electro spyder in the rain, snow, sleet, every weather imaginable and it performed flawlessly without a single hiccup.

chongballa
12-11-2009, 07:22 PM
it was one of our rental guns back in the old pbnm days. it was a total accident and when i found it i thought i was going to have to replace all the seals and stuff. it worked though like it was new

durdan988
03-10-2010, 09:19 PM
I've personally have used extensively a cocker trilogy and am currently using an x7. I would use my x7 over my cocker any day. I've had so many issues with my cocker, but its accurate as hell. a fair amount of the issues were u.s.e.r. errors, but more than enough of them were gun malfunctions to annoy me. As opposed to my x7, ive had nothing but fun with that wonderful piece of technology.

chongballa
03-11-2010, 04:37 PM
buy a pump kit for that trilly

ALLAHTRON
03-24-2010, 09:13 PM
Its really is a matter of who the wielder is. I'm a milsim guy. I do paintball for my militia. So to me its lighter than a all SOPMOD equipped m-4 . Thumbs up Tippman. For the milsim, and the sting to back it up.